Dioptra App Moon sighting vs Redshift 8 professional planetarium software prediction
The Dioptra
App and the Redshift 8 planetarium software are promising tools which should
have applications in doing experiments in the spherical earth vs flat earth
controversy. Here’s some preliminary results testing these tools and a proposal
for one way they could be used in a future experiment to test spherical vs flat
earth models.
I remember
getting the Redshift software for my Mac back in the mid 90s and successfully
using it to predict and identify planets and stars and their positions in the
night sky. There are quite a few brands of similar software on the market now,
but without doing too much research I decided to go with the current premium version
of Redshift now available for around $60.
So I took a
sighting of the Moon with the Dioptra App on my Android Smart phone and then
entered the same time and location parameters into Redshift for comparison.
Dioptra:
Azimuth 102 deg magnetic & Altitude 38.4 deg
Redshift:
Azimuth 114.9 deg true = 101.6 deg magnetic & Altitude 39.8 deg
This seems
like pretty good agreement, but I will investigate further to determine if the
results are within the experimental uncertainties expected for Dioptra and
Redshift, or if there are any other explanations for the slight differences.
I plan to
get a couple of friends, one over 900 miles north of me in Canada, and another almost
500 miles south of me in San Diego to take similar sightings of the Moon when
high in the sky, and compare with my sightings, in order to determine if the
data is consistent with the spherical earth model or a flat earth model. This
should be a very simple and straightforward calculation to perform, taking into
account the precise locations in terms of latitude and longitude for the
sightings and also the precise times for the sightings.
I will
report on those results once they are available, and I encourage others to do
similar experiments and report on their results.
Comments
Post a Comment