Running Tracks Worldwide Affirm Spherical Earth
Spherical
Earth Affirming One Running Track At A Time
INTRODUCTION
In my
previous blog post I mentioned looking at shorter trips and even walking routes
that might give ample evidence to clearly affirm the spherical earth and debunk
the flat earth.
And as I
have tried a few different things, I have come upon a concept that will truly
bring spherical earth affirming and flat earth debunking to the masses all over
the world.
It turns out
that no matter where you go throughout the world, wherever there is
civilization, there are sports fields and running tracks, the tracks being
nominally 400 meters around for one lap. It is true that there have been some
different standards throughout the years, so tracks of differing dimensions
will certainly be found. But anyone could easily measure for themselves the
dimensions of their track for further verification if desired.
So no matter
where most people live, they are most likely going to be able to find a nearby
school with a track where they can go and do some walking (or running) around
the track and do experiments with their GPS’s.
I have
already done three different tracks at schools close to where I live. I will
share the details of the one I just did yesterday.
PROSPECT
HIGH TRACK WALK
I walked 12
laps in 1 hour 8 minutes 43 seconds. I stayed in the outermost lane the whole
time, which in this case happened to be lane 8. I noted exactly where I started
and after each lap would pause at that point for a few seconds just to mark
that in the GPS data trace. As before, I used the tracking feature in GPS
Essentials on my smartphone.
Once you
finish the walk, you stop the tracking and then export the KML file. I then go
to the website GPSVisualizer.com where I can upload the file and manipulate it
in various ways, as I have explained in detail in previous posts. If you wish
you can immediately have GPSVisualizer display the trace on a google map. I
also convert it to a text file so I can import it into Excel where I do other
calculations of my own, which again I have covered in detail in previous posts.
The beauty
of using these running tracks is that they are pretty much standard throughout
the world and wherever they are you can find them on google maps and verify
that the traces of these tracks in terms of latitude and longitude make sense
according to spherical earth surface geometry, but show major inconsistencies
when trying to explain them according to flat earth circular disk surface
geometry.
The
inconsistencies become greater and greater the further south you go, so that in
South America or Australia the inconsistencies are truly gross. Do you suppose
that there may be some Olympic records that need to be adjusted according to
flat earth theory? This is truly an important question to ponder. This is not
unlike in an earlier blog post where I pointed out that the around the world
flight non-stop without refueling was much more impressive and a greater world
record according to flat earth theory.
So for my
trip around the track 12 times I travelled 5.58 km at an average speed of 4.88
km/hr and these checked out with my own independent calculations in the Excel
spreadsheet. For the flat earth surface geometry, the Excel spreadsheet showed
that I travelled 6.01 km at an average speed of 5.25 km/hr in flat earth
fiction land. The Excel spreadsheet also showed that the fictitious flat speed
increased in a regular pulsating manner throughout the walk according to the
regular changes in heading that going around a regular shaped track naturally
produces.
As before I
am sharing all my files through my Scribd account. You would at least need to
register for a free Scribd account to be able to download the files, I believe.
20171210182010-38065-data text file
https://www.scribd.com/document/366933534/20171210182010-38065-data
558488ProspectTrack8thLane Excel file
https://www.scribd.com/document/366933719/558488-Prospect-Track-8-Th-Lane
558488ProspectTrack8thLaneSphFlt Excel file
https://www.scribd.com/document/366933868/558488ProspectTrack8thLaneSphFlt
I have also
set up a special email address where anybody can email me GPS data files that
they might like me to process for them. I have no idea how many might send me
such files, so I cannot make any promises about processing all of them.
Certainly those with some written explanation of what is included would rate
higher in priority to process.
SphereAffirmer@att.net
WILL FLAT
EARTH ADVOCATES INDEFINITELY CLAIM THEY HAVE NO FLAT EARTH MAP?
We simply
cannot let the flat earth advocates continue to use their ruse of claiming they
have no flat earth map to continue evading the clear deviations from reality of
their theory. The problem is that different aspects of their theory together
lead to conflicting conclusions. I covered this in a satirical manner in my
earlier blog post on Tri-Location on the Flat Earth.
So let me
just state the simplest part of their theory that should clearly establish a
correspondence between coordinates on the spherical earth map versus their
claimed flat earth map. Since they show the Sun completing a cycle in 1 day or
24 hours, the Sun would have to traverse 360 degrees of longitude in 24 hours.
This would be the same whether you have a spherical earth or a flat circular
disk shaped earth. So if you know the longitude of a city on the spherical
earth its longitude should be exactly the same on the flat earth map. Similar
arguments can be made that latitude should also be equivalent if the equator
and tropics of Capricorn and Cancer are interpreted equivalently between
spherical and flat models, as surely they must be or the flat earth theory
makes absolutely no sense at all.
So if you
were to go to a southern hemisphere place in Chile or Australia and layout a
running track according to flat earth geometry of latitude and longitude its
shape will be grossly different than the actual running track laid out
according to real measurements and also in precise agreement with spherical
earth surface geometry of latitude and longitude. I plan to show this
graphically in a future post.
Comments
Post a Comment